The Canadian Global Affairs Institute provides credible, open access expertise on global affairs. With your support, we can continue to spark impassioned nation-wide discussions designed to help Canadians better understand their role in the international arena.
S U P P O R T   U S

Ottawa’s disappointing fighter jet decision: Sadly, politics as usual



by Elinor Sloan

The Globe and Mail
November 24, 2016

The Liberal government’s decision to sole-source buy 18 Boeing Super Hornets is a disappointing return to politics as usual. A year ago, the Trudeau government entered office offering “real change” to how the government goes about its business. In place of the “secretive,” “closed-off” practices of the Conservatives, the Liberals offered fair and open government. Criticizing the Conservatives for deciding on a fighter aircraft without a competition, the Liberals promised they would immediately launch an open and transparent competition to replace the CF-18s.

On Tuesday, the Liberals announced that, in fact, any competition was many years off. An urgent sole-source buy is necessary, they argue, because of a growing capability gap that is leaving Canada unable to meet its NORAD and NATO commitments. Since the numbers around Canada’s fighter obligations to NORAD and NATO are classified, it is impossible to determine separately if there is indeed an urgent capability gap. But just last April, the commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force said in testimony before the House of Commons that the combination of a competition and an upgrade project designed to take the CF-18 fleet to about 2025 would put Canada “in a comfortable position” to meet its defence commitments. In other words, there was a clear and viable alternative to a sole-source buy.

A key concern for the Liberal government is the cost of the F-35. But an “interim buy” will increase the cost to Canada of maintaining a fighter force. Until such time, as the CF-18s are retired, Canada will incur the significant costs of maintaining two fleets of aircraft. While the Super Hornet is the newest version of the CF-18 (Hornet), its acquisition will require the training of pilots and technicians, and acquiring different ground-support equipment. Buying more Super Hornets as a result of the now-promised competition some years from now would, of course, eliminate the two-fleet problem. But what if the competition does not yield the Super Hornet? The 18 aircraft will continue to fly; they are, after all, a 40-year aircraft, and in that sense are inaccurately described as “interim.”

The government did not say how long it would take to acquire the Super Hornets. But it is entirely conceivable a fair and open competition could produce aircraft in a comparable time frame. Over the past decade, Canada has studied the various fighter options on numerous occasions. Just last July, aerospace firms were given a month to complete a lengthy questionnaire on their aircraft, so the government would have the most up-to-date information.

Military procurements take a notoriously long time, but this is not a competition that would have started from scratch – far from it. And today, all of Canada’s fighter options (Super Hornet, Joint Strike Fighter, French Rafale, Eurofighter and Swedish Gripen) are operational and available for purchase.

The Trudeau government entered office promising “real change” for Canada in how the government goes about its business. The decision to sole-source buy fighter aircraft at this time, rather than holding a fair and open competition, is an unnecessary and disappointing return to politics as usual.

Elinor Sloan is professor of International Relations at Carleton University and a former defence analyst with the Department of National Defence.

Image: Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Biden’s push for EV revolution is a ‘win’ for Canada: Policy Analyst

by BNN Bloomberg (feat. Eric Miller), BNN Bloomberg, January 20, 2021

New US Arctic strategies ignore climate risks in focus on geopolitics, experts say

by Melody Schreiber (feat. Tim Choi), Arctic Today, January 20, 2021

From Alberta’s oilsands to tariffs, how Biden’s presidency could change Canada

by Graham Slaughter, Ryan Flanagan, and Rachel Aiello (feat. Sarah Goldfeder, Stephen Saideman, and Laurie Trautman), CTV News, January 20, 2021

Challenges ahead despite major shift in Canada-U.S. relations under President Biden: expert

by Cormac Mac Sweeney and Kathryn Tindale (feat. Colin Robertson), News 1130, January 20, 2021

How Biden’s Made-in-America plan could impact Canadian companies

by Brett Bundale (feat. Colin Robertson), BNN Bloomberg, January 20, 2021

Biden’s plan to cancel Keystone pipeline signals a rocky start with Canada

by Amanda Coletta (feat. Eric Miller), Washington Post, January 19, 2021

The road ahead for Biden’s unnamed ambassador to Canada

by Charlie Pinkerton (feat. Eric Miller), iPolitics, January 19, 2021

Trump’s political legacy: How will the U.S. president be remembered?

by Meredith MacLeod (feat. Sarah Goldfeder), CTV News, January 19, 2021

Canadian Conservatives reckon with fallout from Capitol Hill riot

by Maura Forrest (feat. Peter Donolo), Politico, January 18, 2021

Project Syndicate Commentators’ Predictions for 2021

by Project Syndicate (feat. Robert Muggah), The Washington Diplomat, January 16, 2021

Minding the gap

by CBA National (feat. Lawrence Herman), National Magazine, January 15, 2021


Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 150–9th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3H9


Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6


Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca


Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.


© 2002-2021 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email