Ukraine has a peace deal. Why isn't it working?

Diversity_in_GiC_appointments_Montages.JPG

OP-ED

by Andrew Rasiulis

iPolitics
March 2, 2017

With the Trump administration getting its policy framework in gear, it’s a good time to reflect on the lack of progress to date in implementing the key political terms of the Minsk 2 ceasefire deal, agreed to in February 2015 between the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany and intended to ensure a lasting peace in Ukraine.

Two years have passed without significant progress on either Ukrainian constitutional reform or the restoration of Ukrainian sovereign control over the rebel-held Donbass region and the border with Russia.

It was agreed in the text of Minsk 2 that the political framework of constitutional reform would lead to some form of autonomy in the Donbass, verified by local elections — which would lead to the restoration of Ukrainian sovereign control over the breakaway region.

This process should have been completed by the end of 2015. Instead, thus far we’ve seen a political stalemate with sporadic military confrontations along the ceasefire line. What happened?

On the critical issue of autonomy, the sequence was that Kiev was to pass special legislation granting semi-autonomy to the Donbass, including protection of the Russian language. Under this legislation, the rebel areas would hold elections to determine their form of self government within a united but federated Ukraine. This step required a major political change within Ukraine to move from a centralized to a federated state.

Once this phase was complete, the Russians were to then use their influence over the rebels and hand over border control between the Donbass and Russia to Kiev’s control. Minsk did not address Crimea — that’s a matter that must be addressed by a different diplomatic mechanism.

Minsk 2 does have its sequential logic. The issue for Kiev is that it considers it politically suicidal to grant autonomy to the Donbass in the face of Ukrainian nationalists. The Russians and the Donbass rebels will not settle for anything less, economic sanctions notwithstanding. Result: stalemate.

It now remains to be seen whether the Trump administration will have the influence with players in Kiev and Moscow to make a deal on Ukraine in 2017.

Image: AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
 
SEARCH
PODCAST

The Royal Canadian Navy in the Indo-Pacific: A Discussion with Matthew Fisher

June 18, 2018



On today's Global Exchange Podcast, we turn our eyes to the Indo-Pacific, as we assess Canada's naval presence in the region, and the recent deployment of MV Asterix to take part in various multilateral exercises with Canada's Pacific allies. Join our host, Dave Perry, in conversation with CGAI Fellow Matthew Fisher, as they discuss Canada's naval presence around the Indo-Pacific, Chinese military build-up throughout the East and South China Seas, the successes of MV Asterix's recent deployment in the Pacific, and a future for the Canadian Navy in an increasingly militarized Pacific environment.


IN THE MEDIA

Singapore and a Safer World

by David Kilgour (feat. James Trottier), The Epoch Times, June 18, 2018

Malfunctioning sensor another ‘snag’ for prime minister’s aging plane

by Mercedes Stephenson (feat. Dave Perry), CTV News, June 17, 2018


LATEST TWEETS

HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9

 

OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6

 

Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca

 

Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.

 

© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001

 


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email