The allure of the right-wing vortex

The_allure_of_the_right-wing_vortex_Montages.jpg

OP-ED

by Vanja Petricevic

Frontline Security
June 19, 2017

Europe and its citizens find themselves in the midst of a radical right-wing vortex that has been sweeping across the European continent. Called on to withstand these political forces in the May 7 presidential run-off, French voters refused to succumb to the unwavering radical right-wing rhetoric of Marine Le Pen by casting a vote for a fairly new figure within political circles – Emmanuel Macron. In his victory speech, Macron mesmerized his supporters by his stage demeanor and eloquent disposition while expressing his gratitude to them for having engaged in a courageous fight. His assertive proclamation – “France won” – underscored the significance of this victory. However, one is left wondering: can we say the same for others who are still fighting a similar fight in Europe? The answer is rather daunting given the surge in right-wing radicalism in recent years.

While France has barely escaped falling into the far-right trap this time, the right-wing radicals’ allure will not fade anytime soon.

Several factors can drive voters into a niche that is fueled with opportunities to pass judgment. Euroskeptic hard-liners are undoubtedly emboldened by Brexit (as an example of what national independence looks like in the age of supranationalism and the push for a “wider and deeper” European Union. Britain's rejection of the EU resonates with certain sectors of the electorate that have lost trust in the EU’s ability to address their needs and wants, and which sympathetically position themselves toward the declining EU favorability rates. The far-right parties feed off of, what they consider to be weaknesses of the EU’s current state of affairs and utilize such as means of voter mobilization. However, in order to sustain themselves on the fringes of the political right, these parties are aware that running single-issue campaigns will not immerse them in the electoral fortunes they desire. Therefore, they continue to strategically re-position themselves by carving out spaces within the EU sphere of influence.

The far-right parties weave their way through electoral politics by proposing radical solutions to socio-economic and political problems.

The rise in immigration, the surge in terrorist attacks across Europe,  continued uncertainty about proper protection of refugees arriving at European borders, and years of EU austerity-driven measures, among others, are complex and multi-dimensional issues. They deserve the EU’s and individual member states’ unreserved attention, but they are best addressed in a collaborative manner relying on the dynamics and diplomatic patterns that have been the basis of EU’s decision-making frameworks for decades. The far right’s euroskeptic tendencies, their blatant anti-immigration and anti-Islam stance, and their engagement in xenophobic discourse should be taken as a serious threat to the mere principles that underpin post-WWII European politics. Further attempts at anchoring divisions among different groups in their respective countries should not be passively ignored but electorally fought against.

While there might have been sighs of relief on both sides of the Atlantic with recent electoral defeats of Norbert Hofer in Austria, Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, and Marine Le Pen in France, the fact that these parties managed to secure substantial electoral gains in national elections across Europe should serve as a wake-up call for European countries; many of which, up to this point, have largely sidelined the dangers that the far right poses to their countries and the EU as a whole. There is a growing ideological shift in Europe as exemplified by the ever so expanding support base of the far-right parties and their affiliate groups.

By necessity, countries should feel a sense of urgency to better understand and address the underlying causes of the surge of right-wing radicalism in their own countries. We live in an age where it is no longer enough to dismiss them as mere nuisances of politics as there is no guarantee that history cannot repeat itself or be exploited for the sole purpose of the far right’s electoral success. What we ought to dismiss is the misled notion that countries can build an armor of immunity which cannot be pierced by the far right.

The future elections in Europe and the rest of the world will be a litmus test for the far right – and also for the current course and dynamics of European and international politics. The far-right parties should not be allowed to slip under the radar but, if they do, voters should remain vigilant as these parties possess the capability to stage a sudden come-back when it is least expected. Thus, it is the duty of every voter to be informed and “not give in to fear”4 that these parties are trying to instill. They ought to be ready to protect the EU principles which ever so loudly echo the significance of the EU’s motto “United in Diversity”.

Vanja Petricevic is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Florida Gulf Coast University and a Fellow with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute.

Image credit: AP

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
 
SEARCH
PODCAST

The Royal Canadian Navy in the Indo-Pacific: A Discussion with Matthew Fisher

June 18, 2018



On today's Global Exchange Podcast, we turn our eyes to the Indo-Pacific, as we assess Canada's naval presence in the region, and the recent deployment of MV Asterix to take part in various multilateral exercises with Canada's Pacific allies. Join our host, Dave Perry, in conversation with CGAI Fellow Matthew Fisher, as they discuss Canada's naval presence around the Indo-Pacific, Chinese military build-up throughout the East and South China Seas, the successes of MV Asterix's recent deployment in the Pacific, and a future for the Canadian Navy in an increasingly militarized Pacific environment.


IN THE MEDIA

Canada’s oil crisis is far from over

by Nick Cunningham (feat. Dennis McConaghy), OilPrice.com, June 21, 2018

Would denial of Line 3 project mean more oil trains?

by Elizabeth Dunbar (feat. Kevin Birn), MPR News, June 21, 2018


LATEST TWEETS

HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9

 

OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6

 

Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca

 

Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.

 

© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001

 


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email