In The Media

Trudeau channels Harper on refugees

by Candice Malcolm

Toronto Sun
November 25, 2015

The Trudeau government has come to its senses and walked back from its campaign promise to bring in 25,000 Syrian refugees in 2015.

Since being elected and forming the government, this central feature in the Liberal campaign platform has, to use a generous term, evolved.

Last week we learned the original Liberal projection for the cost of this program was off by a factor of ten.

Rather than costing taxpayers $100 million, as Team Trudeau adamantly pledged during the recent election campaign, the effort is now projected to cost us $1.2 billion.

That number is a baseline and likely to rise further, given the proposed funding model shows $877 million will be needed for 2016 alone.

In response to widespread concern over security checks and screenings for Syrian refugees, the Liberal government decided to change the composition of refugees admitted into Canada.

They announced that only women, children, and nuclear families would be admitted through the government-sponsored program, which makes up more than half of the total 25,000 spots.

No unaccompanied males will be accepted.

While the Liberals had earlier shot down the idea of reserving spaces for religious minorities and persecuted groups, such as Assyrian Christians and Yazidi Kurds, they seem to have no problem restricting entry to Canada on the basis of gender.

Regardless, only allowing women, children and families is a blunt way to limit the risk of sleeper agents for Islamic terrorist groups being admitted amidst the refugees.

On Tuesday, the Trudeau government moved even further from its original campaign promise and announced another twist in the ever-progressing Syrian refugee plan.

The core promise — bringing in 25,000 Syrian refugees this year — will not be achieved.

Instead, the Liberals will admit 10,000 refugees in the remaining few weeks of 2015, and work to bring in another 15,000 in 2016.

Does that sound familiar? It should. It is very similar to what the Harper Conservatives had pledged.

When former prime minister Stephen Harper made his proposal, equipped with the knowledge of Canada’s security protocol and a reasonable timeline for admitting refugees in mind, he was scolded for not doing enough.

His government was accused of being heartless and sluggish.

Trudeau, who was by contrast naive about the refugee resettlement process, was praised for an ambitious humanitarian commitment.

In an interview Tuesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada’s new commitment to Syrian refugees would “make up for some lost years where Canada was not as helpful on the refugee front.”

Without a trace of irony, Trudeau condemned the Conservative policy while announcing his intention to replicate it.

We should be thankful that the Trudeau government has come to its senses before putting Canada’s national security at risk.

We should, however, demand a little more humility from our rookie prime minister.

Under Harper, the Conservative government admitted the highest sustained average number of new Canadians in our history, including marked increases in privately sponsored refugees.

Under Harper’s watch, Canada welcomed refugees from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, China, and Tibet to name a few.

When it came to refugees, the Harper government was compassionate and responsible.

That’s why Trudeau is now taking a page from Harper’s policy book.

Trudeau should be congratulated for making a prudent decision when it comes to Syrian refugees.

He would be wise, however, to avoid the baseless partisan potshots while doing an about-face on a major campaign promise.


Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
 
SEARCH
PODCAST

Evaluating the 2018 U.S. Midterms with Sarah Goldfeder & Laura Dawson

November 12, 2018

On today's Global Exchange Podcast, CGAI Vice President Colin Robertson sits down with CGAI Fellow Sarah Goldfeder and CGAI Advisory Council Member Laura Dawson to discuss last week's midterm election in the United States. Join Colin, Laura, and Sarah as they debate the implications of the 2018 U.S. midterm on the agenda of Donald Trump, the effect a Democratic House of Representatives will have on Canada, as well as what the election means for bilateral relations moving forward.



EXPERTS IN THE MEDIA

Pence announces US-ASEAN ‘Smart Cities Partnership’

by Patsy Widakuswara (feat. Stephen Nagy), VOA News, November 15, 2018

Canada’s Latin American trade complications

by Chuck Chiang (feat. Colin Robertson), Business in Vancouver, November 14, 2018


LATEST TWEETS

HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9

 

OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6

 

Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca

 

Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.

 

© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001

 


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email