The Canadian Global Affairs Institute provides credible, open access expertise on global affairs. With your support, we can continue to spark impassioned nation-wide discussions designed to help Canadians better understand their role in the international arena.
S U P P O R T   U S

In The Media

Obama is passing the buck – and it’s a big one – by keeping troops in Afghanistan

by George Petrolekas

The Globe and Mail
October 16, 2015

Haunted by criticism that the premature withdrawal of U.S. forces in Iraq led to the rise of the Islamic State and the subsequent collapse of the Iraqi security forces, President Barack Obama has been forced to reconsider his promises, an illustration that realities on the ground impact the best of intents.

As a consequence, the President’s previous plan to only have 1,000 US troops in Kabul by year’s end has changed: He announced he’ll keep just short of 10,000 through most of 2016 at bases in Kabul, Bagram, Kandahar and Jalalabad.

Let’s remember 2008: A new hope-filled and optimistic President Obama promised his war-weary nation that he would end America’s foreign wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and close the chapter on the global “war on terror” by closing the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

Today, in Obama’s seventh year in office, Guantanamo remains open with 114 prisoners caught in a legal twilight zone where Congress forbids their transfer to American soil, yet are considered too dangerous to release but are not actually facing any charges. Many of these prisoners were seized in Afghanistan.

Late last year after close to 14 years of low-level war, which saw U.S. strategy in the conflict change four times (from rebuilding with an Afghan Marshall Plan, combatting an insurgency, a surge and then an abandonment of development to focus solely on the training of an Afghan Army ), the U.S. in conjunction with NATO convinced themselves that the Afghan Army was well enough trained and equipped to defend the state.

However, since April of this year, Afghanistan appears to be a barely contained conflict now complicated by the emergence of the Islamic State in addition to a resurgent Taliban.

Seven provinces have seen districts overtaken by Taliban or Islamic State fighters, the most significant being the seizure of Kunduz for close to a two-week period recently. The difficulties that U.S.-supported Afghan forces face were laid bare by the tragic attack on a Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders)-staffed hospital in the city.

The decision to keep troops in Afghanistan through 2016 is a tacit admission that the Afghan Army and the police simply cannot protect the country on their own and especially without financial and training assistance and U.S. air support.

It is difficult to characterize this policy reversal as either good or bad. The force level that will be retained may only be enough to keep the lid on the pressure cooker, it does not eliminate the Taliban or the Islamic State in Afghanistan and at best contains it. Yet not having kept a presence virtually assured that Afghanistan would become another vacuum with wider regional effects.

The White House has tried to thread the needle by declaring that U.S. combat is over and remaining forces would only engage in counterterrorism, training and assisting Afghan partners, but the truth is Afghanistan has become another location where the U.S. is fighting, with air strikes and raids, with no strategic end in sight.

By only committing to keeping forces to the end of 2016, President Obama has in essence passed the buck to his successor to solve.

George Petrolekas is a fellow with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. He has served in Bosnia and Afghanistan and has been an adviser to senior NATO commanders.


Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Is UN Peacekeeping Losing its Appeal?

by Jay Heisler (feat. Tim Dunne), Voice of America, July 22, 2021

Privatizing Forests; Right-Wing Extremism; Vaccine Passports; Crypto Sustainability

by Ryan Jespersen (feat. Aden Dur-e-Aden), Real Talk Ryan Jespersen, July 21, 2021

Why the Canadian Forces need big iron

by David Reevely (feat. David Perry and Ron Lloyd), The Logic, July 21, 2021

U.S. not rushing to ease travel restrictions at Canadian border

by James McCarten (feat. Laurie Trautman), National Observer, July 21, 2021

The Road to 100% zero-emission vehicles by 2035

by Larysa Harapyn (feat. Brian Kingston), Financial Post, July 20, 2021

Canada to Reopen Border with US to Fully Vaccinated Travelers

by Craig McCulloch (feat. Laurie Trautman), Voice of America, July 20, 2021

Country-of-origin labelling discussion re-emerges in U.S.

by Jennifer Blair (feat. Fawn Jackson), Canadian Cattlemen, July 20, 2021

Invited but Not Let In: Canada Places Thousands of Lives on Hold

by Reedah Hayder (feat. Andrew Griffith), Toronto Star, July 15, 2021


Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 150–9th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3H9


Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6


Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: [email protected]
Web: cgai.ca


Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.


© 2002-2021 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email