China’s Newest Aircraft Carrier: What is it for?


May 9, 2017

by David Bercuson

Last week, China launched its first domestically built aircraft carrier in the northern port city of Dalian.  Its first carrier, the Liaoning, was built in the former USSR but was laid up for years when the Soviet Union’s military lapsed during the bad old days of president Boris Yeltsin.  The Chinese bought it, rebuilt it and modernized it, putting a small carrier air wing aboard it.  It deploys regularly around the East and South China seas. 

The second carrier is quite similar to the first, about half the size of the older Nimitz-class carriers that are the mainstay of the U.S. Navy’s carrier strike forces, but not nuclear-propelled. It now will be fitted out, undergo sea trials and probably join the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) by 2020.

In some ways it is quite curious that China is intent on developing a small carrier fleet.  It is likely this second carrier will be joined in due course by a third and possibly a fourth and that the newer carriers will be larger, with straight, rather than “ski-jump” flight decks.  In the past the Chinese have downplayed the existence of the powerful U.S. carrier fleet, claiming that in this day of precision-guided bombs and anti-ship missiles, an aircraft carrier is nothing more than a bigger target to be destroyed by conventional air or missile attack.

The Chinese are surely correct about the vulnerability of aircraft carriers, even with up-to-date defensive systems.  In the Second World War, the British, Americans and Japanese suffered significant carrier losses and although both offence and defensive firepower today way outstretches that of 70 years ago, the fact of surface ships’ vulnerability in the face of an equivalently equipped enemy is no less true.

Why then are the Chinese intent on building what will be the second largest carrier fleet in the world?  Power projection pure and simple, especially in the oceans and seas that are closest and most important to China.

An aircraft carrier is a power-projection, offensive weapons system.  Its true purpose, going right back to the first carriers or carrier-like ships of the First World War, was to extend the fleet’s hitting power well beyond the range of the big guns aboard the battleships and battle cruisers of the day.  Before that long ago war ended, British aircraft launched from flight decks mounted aboard conventional surface ships bombed German Zeppelin facilities on the North Sea’s coast.

Carriers operate best in a permissive environment.  This means that the U.S., for example, can use carriers to launch strikes against enemies which cannot retaliate against the carrier strike group, but that a carrier’s value would be  much less in an armed conflict with another major power.   A carrier strike against a Syrian target would be a very different event than a carrier strike against a Chinese port or a Chinese fleet.

The Chinese know all this and yet have decided to put considerable resources into the development of these seaborne assets.

The answer to why the Chinese have embarked on this course is simple.  China has, for at least a decade, been developing naval assets not simply for the defence of Chinese coastal waters, but to project power around the rims of the South China Sea, the East China Sea and even the Indian Ocean.  In doing so, China believes — likely correctly —that its diplomatic power will be considerably enhanced without having to fire a single shot. 

Thus, the carriers should be seen as the flip side of China’s reefs that have been turned into naval and air bases and which now dot the outline of its claims to sovereignty in the South China Sea.  One other consideration must be kept in mind:  although the U.S. has 10 Nimitz-class carriers, their mission is to cover the world’s oceans.   The Chinese will eventually outnumber the U.S. in carriers in the waters that really matter to it.

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Security, Commerce and FDI in Canada

October 1, 2019

Toronto, Ontario | GET TICKETS

Priorities for the Next Government

October 24, 2019

Vancouver, British Columbia


China's Rise as a Rule Maker and Tech Empire

August 19, 2019

(feat. Colin Robertson and Stephen Nagy)

Learning and Adapting, or not

August 21, 2019

(feat. Stéfanie von Hlatky, Stephen Saideman, Alexander Salt, and Christopher Ankersen)

Canada's mission in Iraq

August 16, 2019

(feat. Dave Perry and Colin Keiver)


Trudeau and Pompeo urged to speak with one voice on China's response to Hong Kong protests

by David Thurton (featuring Colin Robertson), CBC News, August 22, 2019

U.K.'s Boris Johnson expected to press Trudeau on trade pact at G7

by Murray Brewster (featuring Colin Robertson), CBC News, August 22, 2019

Secretary Pompeo Visiting Ottawa Tomorrow (13:35)

by Vassy Kapelos (featuring Colin Robertson), Power and Politics, CBC, , August 21, 2019


Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9


Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6


Phone: (613) 288-2529


Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.


© 2002-2019 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email