Strategic Studies Working Group Publications

Strategic Studies Working Group Papers

2014 Papers

2013 Papers

Can We Ever Have Technological Security?
by Tom Keenan
Thomas Keenan, Adjunct Professor of Computer Science and Research Fellow at the Centre for Military and Strategic Studies at the University of Calgary makes several recommendations on how the government can improve technological security, but concludes that absolute technological security is unattainable as long as humans are part of the system.

Shutting the Backdoor: The Perils of National Security and Digital Surveillance Programs
by Ron Deibert
In a new report for the Strategic Studies Working Group, Ron Deibert, professor of political science, and Director of the Canada Centre for Global Security Studies and the Citizen Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs, argues that as governments have sought to monitor digital communications for security purposes, the ''Backdoor'' paradigm has become the most predominant approach. He concludes that in the world of ''Big Data'' new methods of connecting the dots must be explored other than those that drill holes into our communications infrastructure.

The Future of Drones in Canada: Perspectives from a Former RCAF Fighter Pilot
by DF Holman
Fraser Holman, a retired RCAF pilot with 35 years experience, questions the likelihood of the implementation of Unarmed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in the Canadian military. he analyses their strengths and shortcomings including communications vulnerabilities, degrees of automation and autonomy, rotary versus fixed wing applications, legal and airspace management constraints, and the potential roles in which UAVs might offer an immediate advantage.

The Future of Foreign Military Training
by Mike Jeffery
The Future of Foreign Military Training by Mike Jeffery In a new report for the Strategic Studies Working Group LGen (Ret'd) Mike Jeffery examines the nature of foreign military training. He concludes that the Canadian Forces have indeed excelled at providing foreign military training, but the effectiveness of such assistance has been limited due a lack of strategic focus and consequent short term provision of training.

The National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy: An Update
by Eric Lerhe
A new paper from the Strategic Studies Working Group, a partnership between CDFAI and the Canadian International Council by Commodore (Ret'd) Eric Lerhe investigates the claim that the $35 billion National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy is in trouble as a result of contractual, financial, and design difficulties.

TOP OF PAGE

2012 Papers

Canada and NATO: A Military Assessment
by Elinor Sloan
Elinor Sloan examine NATO's ability to conduct out of area crisis management operations in a new paper for the Strategic Studies Working Group. The paper focuses specifically on Canada in Kandahar from 2006-2011 and concludes that strong US leadership is required for NATO operations and that Canada should say "yes" to operations preponderantly led by the United States. Finally, Canada must ensure from the outset that any future NATO non-Article V operation it participates in, enjoys core US support and direction. Canada has a role to play as a dependable and capable ally, but we must decide how to respond to this opportunity.

Canada and the Five Eyes Intelligence Community
by James Cox
University of Ottawa, and Carleton University foreign policy professor, James Cox states that the arrest of Canadian Sub-Lieutenant Jeffery Delisle in January 2012 for supplying Top Secret intelligence to Russia may have been a brief set-back for Canada's credibility in the Five Eyes, but while Canada must work to restore the trust and confidence of its Five Eyes partners, there are far bigger issues looming that will ensure Canada will continue to be a valuable and credible intelligence source for the Five Eyes network.

Comprehensive Security Requires Comprehensive Structures- How Comprehensive Can We Get?
by Anne Fitz-Gerald and Don Macnamara
Despite the generational calls for ‘3-D’, ‘joined-up’, ‘Whole of Government’ and, more recently, ‘comprehensive’ approaches to security, it is still unclear as to what Canada’s concept of security is, how it is promoted, pursued and projected at home and abroad, and how it is managed by Ottawa-based government ministries and departments. A new paper from the Strategic Studies Working Group seeks to answer these questions.

F-35 and the Future of Canadian Security
by Richard Shimooka
Canada's participation in the Joint Strike Fighter project has been fraught with much controversy and a lack of clarity. A new research paper from Richard Shimooka aims to assess how the F-35 meets Canadian requirements over the next few decades. It concludes that the F-35 likely represents the future of Western tactical air forces for the next 40 years, and that the F-35 is best suited to meet the future range of foreign and domestic challenges facing Canada.

Recapitalizing the Canadian Forces’ Major Fleets: Assessing Lingering Controversies and Challenges
by Philippe Lagassé
Canada's Conservative government is commited to recapitalizing the Canadian military's major fleets - at least in principle. Unfortunately, the replacement of the military's major fleets has not gone as well as hoped. The sheer size and complexity of recapitalizing the military, as well as the burdens placed on the defence department's limited procurement staff, slowed the process from the beginning. Unless new money is invested into the CF's recapitalization efforts, the military will likely have to make do with fewer platforms, or less capable equipment.

TOP OF PAGE

2011 Papers

A Separate Defence Procurement Agency: Will it Actually Make a Difference?
by Dr. Craig Stone
In this new paper from the Strategic Studies Working Group, Craig Stone, Director of Academics at the Canadian Forces College, argues that creating a separate government department is not the answer to problems with defence procurement as it will not fix the underlying problems that all developed nations experience with large complex military procurement projects: cost overruns; delayed deliveries; and equipment not meeting requirements.

Can R2P Survive Libya and Syria?
by Martha Hall Findlay
Martha Hall Findlay explains that the very first time the Canadian-inspired concept of "Responsibility to Protect" was invoked by the UN Security Council was to support the no-fly zone in Libya. Ironically, it will be the events that subsequently transpired in Libya, together with corresponding inaction in Syria, which may put the future of R2P at risk.

Securing the Continent: Where is NORAD Today?
by Alan Stephenson
Col (Ret’d) Alan Stephenson, a PhD candidate at Carleton University and a 35 year veteran of the Canadian Forces, assess the importance of the NORAD Command to North American defence and security in 2011 and addresses accusations of institutional irrelevance and of infringement on Canadian sovereignty. He argues that NORAD is not only still relevant, but perfectly positioned to be the ‘eyes and ears’ of both Canada and the United States in the Arctic.

The Role of the Militia in Today’s Canadian Forces
by Jack English
Jack English, a widely published military historian, former infantry officer and senior research officer for the Minister's Monitoring Committee for recommendations of the Somalia Inquiry and the Special Commission on the Restructuring of the Reserves, examines the role of the Militia within the Canadian Forces. He contends that mobilization must be a primary function, as well as remaining an honourable vocation in and of itself.

The Canadian Navy and the Canadian Coast Guard: Cooperating Sea Services or Co-existing Federal Fleets
by Jy Forcier
In this paper JY Forcier, a retired Vice-Admiral with a distinguished 34 year career in the Canadian Navy, examines the role of the Coast Guard as opposed to the Navy and answers why Canada has both services. He makes three important recommendations that will strengthen the cooperation of these two services and enhance Maritime Security.

Canada's International Role (video)
by David Bercuson, Jack Granatstein and Denis Stairs
On June 14th, 2011, the National Capital Branch of the Canadian International Council held a panel discussion on Canada's International Role with CDFAI's David Bercuson, Jack Granatstein and Denis Stairs. They discussed the impact of the Conservative government on Canada's international policy.

Canada’s Citizen Soldiers: A Discussion Paper (full version)
Canada’s Citizen Soldiers: A Discussion Paper (abridged version)
by David Pratt
In this Research Paper, David Pratt, Senior Vice-President of Public Affairs for GCI and a Senior Research Fellow with the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute, examines the current state of the Reserves. Pratt stipulates that the historic role of the Reserves, for Mobilization, has no relevance in the current strategic environment. Instead, their current roles of augmentation and providing a footprint in the community, should be the focus. Additionally, Reserves may be able to play new roles, such as combating the threats associated with cyber-security.

‘Now for the Hard Part’: A User’s Guide to Renewing the Canadian-American Partnership
by Colin Robertson
In advance of Harper and Obama's meeting, Colin Robertson outlines what a successful deal between the two nations would encompass: “a security perimeter that embraces people and goods entering by land, sea or air”; “mutually enhanced competitiveness through coordination of infrastructure investments and regulatory compatibility”; and “joint stewardship of our ‘commons’, especially in the management of resources and climate change.”

TOP OF PAGE

Strategic Studies Working Group Projects

Strategic Studies Working Group Books


	National Security Strategy Canada’s National Security in the Post-9/11 World: Strategy, Interests, and Threats Edited by David S. McDonough After the terrorist attacks of 9/11, which targeted the heart of financial and military power in the United States, Canada once again proved its credentials as a key American ally. With the imminent end of its combat role in Afghanistan, however, it is time to take stock of how Canada has adapted to the exigencies of the post-9/11 world and to consider the future directions for its foreign, defence, and security policies. This timely exploration and re-assessment of Canada’s approach to strategic affairs offers a diverse set of nuanced, sometimes controversial, and always insightful perspectives on the most pressing security challenges that Canada currently faces. Bringing together noted experts on these issues – including a Canadian Senator, a past Minister of National Defence, former high-level military officers, and top scholars – this collection provides powerful ideas and guidance for the difficult task of formulating an overarching national security strategy. David S. McDonough is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science at Dalhousie University. Anticipated publication date: Early 2012. TOP OF PAGE

	E-Book Excerpt From “The Canadian Forces in 2025”, edited by J.L. Granatstein Introduction by J.L. Granatstein Available for purchase HERE. The chapters in this book offer sound and sensible forecasts on what the future of Canadian defence policy might look like in 2025. The authors’ conclusions are sensible and sound, to be sure, but they are written on the basis of rational prediction, on what the expert authors expect to happen to the Canadian Forces a decade-and-a-half in the future. In a very real sense, their chapters suggest what should happen. But there are also other factors than assessments of military necessity at play, primarily the global situation and the social and political trends that will certainly enter into the shaping of Canadian policy. In their own ways, the authors try to factor in these trends, but there is some utility in laying out the dimensions of the problems that Canada might face in 2025. Everything is, of course, dependent on the global situation, and it may well be full of surprises; it usually is. If current trends persist, what seems all but certain is that China will be stronger and the United States weaker in both military and economic terms by 2025. There is no doubt today that the U.S. is the sole superpower, the only nation with a military that can operate and prevail anywhere. But the American economy is less certain, and the nation’s ability to keep spending huge sums on defence is already under pressure, and that pressure can only increase. By 2025, the Americans will still be top dog, but their dog will likely be smaller. China's economy is slowing today, its huge population has major demographic problems, its increasing percentage of GDP devoted to defence is straining its budget, and the aggressive posture Beijing has adopted in its region all suggest a nation yearning to achieve superpower status but worried about controlling its people. In 2025, it will not yet be a global superpower. But barring a political breakdown brought on by China’s internal contradictions that could see Communist Party control fragment, its power will make all other nations hesitate before challenging Beijing in Asia. [1] The United States is already tilting its naval and air power toward Asia, pre-positioning itself for this new era, and Canada will also likely shift some of its limited defence resources into the Pacific. The small operational support hubs that Canada is now setting up in Singapore and the Gulf States in 2012 are an indication that the CF is thinking seriously in this direction, as is the increasing Canadian participation in the ever-larger annual RIMPAC naval/air exercises in the Pacific with friendly states. An expanded “Anglosphere” to encompass the democratic states with interests in the Pacific—Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and possibly France, the Philippines, Singapore, and India—is slowly taking form and by 2025 may have morphed into a diplomatic and military alliance to try to contain China’s burgeoning ambitions. [1] See, e.g., Minxin Pei, “Everything You Think You Know About China is Wrong,” Foreign Policy, 29 Aug. 2012 www.foreignpolicy.com/article/2012/08/29.