Military intervention won’t solve the violence in Rio de Janeiro



by Robert Muggah

LA Times
March 2, 2018

There is a widespread perception that violence in Rio de Janeiro is spinning out of control.

During last month's Carnival celebrations, disturbing clips of tourists getting assaulted and gunfire erupting between rival drug gangs were broadcast repeatedly on television. Then President Michel Temer signed an extraordinary decree putting the military in charge of Rio's police, fire services and prisons.

To some extent, the concern is warranted. Rio's murder rates have climbed back to levels not seen since the mid-2000s, and robberies, car-jackings and other forms of theft are all too common.

But overall, crime rates are not significantly higher than they were a year ago. During Carnival this year, the Rio police reported 5,865 incidents. (This includes 86 killings, 262 drug seizures and more than 1,000 cases of pickpocketing.) That's a lot, but it's only 92 more than the 5,773 incidents reported during last year's festivities.

So why the presidential decree? Or rather, why the decree now?

The reason is simple: political calculus. Polls consistently show that security is the No. 1 priority of Brazilian citizens. Temer and his allies are trying to bolster their tough-on-crime credentials ahead of Brazil's general election in October.

Although the extreme measures may play well with voters, they aren't likely to solve Rio's crime problem.

Rio's security troubles stem from a crisis of governance. The state's governor, Luiz Fernando Pezão, and the capital city's mayor, Marcelo Crivella, have shown little interest in designing or implementing a real public security agenda. For years, two underlying causes of crime — income inequality and concentrated poverty — were allowed to worsen. The military takeover will do nothing to change this.

What's more, there is little reason to believe that the military will be any better at resisting corruption than Rio's police. Drug-trafficking gangs have proved adept at buying off security forces in the past. Just last month, a military officer was arrested on the outskirts of the capital city for transporting illegal assault rifles and cocaine.

This is not the first time that the army has been called in to maintain law and order in Rio. The military has been deployed more than a dozen times since 2008, mostly to secure large events and municipal elections. But it is the first time since Brazil's dictatorship ended in 1985 that the military has been put in charge of the state's entire public security system.

While many Brazilians revere the military, security experts fear that soldiers lack the experience, training and equipment to effectively fight crime. And they aren't the only ones who are concerned. Many activists rightfully fear that, with generals in charge, there will be a rollback of civil liberties and human rights, especially for the poor.

There is a real danger that the military will be drawn into bloody street fights and cause significant civilian casualties, as has happened in Colombia, Mexico and other parts of Central America.

Even the army's commander, Gen. Eduardo Villas Boas, has raised concerns about the risks associated with deploying troops to fight crime. Brazil's former defense minister, Raul Jungmann, has described military interventions as an anesthetic that will produce only short-term relief.

Lasting improvements will be achieved only through far-reaching policy reform.

To really turn things around, Brazil's Supreme Court will need to revise the country's drug policies and fix its appalling prison system. Brazil has the world's third-largest prison population, about a third of which is languishing in pre-trial detention. Complicating matters, a majority of the country's prisons are, in effect, run by drug-trafficking organizations.

Government leaders, together with the private sector, will need to redouble efforts to repair and modernize Rio's military and civilian police forces, which have been crippled by steep budget cuts. Police complain that they lack electricity, gas and even toilet paper. Not surprisingly, morale is at an all-time low.

There have been some positive developments. Rio's police recently introduced crime-mapping technologies for improving transparency and efficiency. Brazil's attorney general has approved a federal task force to investigate organized crime and corruption in Rio's police system.

The success of these measures depends on what happens next. Temer has announced that he is establishing a new federal ministry of public security, to be overseen by Jungmann, though it is unclear how the agency will work. The armed forces have indicated that they will help restructure Rio's police, in part by removing bad cops from duty.

Even so, human rights advocates fear that Temer's decree is part of a larger shift toward more punitive approaches to controlling crime. They have good reason to worry. Some military officials have hinted that the extraordinary measures taken in Rio could be replicated in other states.

Brazilians are understandably looking for quick solutions. Three-quarters of Rio's residents support the federal intervention. But it won't be possible to restore public security through military action alone.

Robert Muggah is a co-founder of the Igarapé Institute, headquartered in Rio de Janeiro, and a co-director of the SecDev Group in Ottawa.

Image credit: Antonio Lacerda / EPA / Shutterstock

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

An Update on the NAFTA Renegotiations

May 21, 2018

On today's Global Exchange Podcast, we touch base with CGAI's North American trade experts in light of a busy week on the NAFTA file in Washington. After months of hard-pressed negotiations, and 6 weeks of 'perpetual' discussions in Washington, the deal has reached its next turning point, with Congressional leadership signalling that they'd need a new deal by May 17th in order to have it passed before U.S. mid-term elections in the Fall. With no deal in sight, and the Congressional deadline now in the rear-view mirror, we sit down with Sarah Goldfeder, Laura Dawson, and Eric Miller to ask where we go from here.


Between Trump, Iran and North Korea, Canada’s G7 has a high potential for chaos

by Chris Hall (feat. James Trottier & Colin Robertson), CBC News, May 18, 2018

The struggle Trudeau could face if Kinder Morgan walks away from Trans Mountain

by Robert Tuttle & Michael Bellusci (feat. Dennis McConaghy), Bloomberg News, May 18, 2018

Canada 'a laughing stock': Experts react to Trans Mountain indemnity

by April Fong (feat. Dennis McConaghy), BNN Bloomberg, May 18, 2018


with Danielle Smith (feat. Sarah Goldfeder), Global News Radio, May 18, 2018

VIDEO: NAFTA Deadline Day (@ 3:00)

with Don Martin (feat. John Weekes), CTV Power Play, May 17, 2018

VIDEO: Deal or no deal on NAFTA: Canada and U.S. send mixed messages

with Rosemary Barton (feat. Colin Robertson), CBC The National, May 17, 2018

Trump’s 'submission' strategy is not working so expect NAFTA talks to drag on

by Kevin Carmichael (Feat. Eric Miller), Financial Post, May 17, 2018

Backstop deal may be last hope for TransMountain pipeline, says former oil executive

by CBC News (feat. Dennis McConaghy), CBC News, May 17, 2018

Stuck with limited oil export options, Liberals may regret B.C. tanker ban

by John Ivison (feat. Dennis McConaghy), National Post, May 17, 2018

Feds OK early start to construction of navy’s new supply ships

by Lee Berthiaume (feat. Dave Perry), The Canadian Press, May 17, 2018


Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9


Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6


Phone: (613) 288-2529


Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.


© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email