Did Saudi Arabia play role in 9/11?

Did_Saudi_Arabia_play_role_Montages.jpg

OP-ED

by Candice Malcolm

Toronto Sun
July 20, 2016

In the Middle East, it can be difficult to tell the difference between a friend and an enemy.

For decades, the United States treated Saudi Arabia as a friend and ally, while the Saudis treated America as an enemy.

A newly declassified report highlights this betrayal.

In 2002, the United States Congress released its inquiry into the 9/11 attacks. But for 14 years, it kept 28 pages hidden from the public.

Those pages were finally released last week.

They outline possible connections between al-Qaida terrorists, Saudi spies in the U.S. and members of the Saudi royal family.

While the Obama administration and Saudi Arabia’s rulers insist the pages provide no conclusive evidence of official Saudi involvement in 9/11 — a view repeated by mainstream media — the report itself offers a somewhat different perspective.

In fact, the first sentence seems to debunk President Barack Obama’s narrative.

It reads: “While in the United States, some of the September 11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support or assistance from, individuals who may be connected to the Saudi Government.”

The report describes an intricate web of possible Saudi spies, consulate staff, government officials, and mosque leaders who allegedly worked alongside the hijackers in the weeks and months leading up to the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history.

Individuals believed to be spies used Saudi-funded Islamic centres and mosques as meeting places.

They stayed in the same apartments and hotels as the hijackers, and were allegedly receiving funds from members of the Saudi royal family.

According to the report, a Saudi intelligence officer “reportedly received funding and possibly a fake passport from Saudi government officials.”

He also reportedly boasted to an imbedded FBI agent that he did more than others to help the hijackers.

U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut, said this new information is “a chilling description of Saudi ties to terrorists, Saudi payments to terrorists, and Saudi obstruction of U.S. antiterrorism investigations.”

Writing in the New York Post, investigative journalist Paul Sperry went further.

“Washington has misled the American people about foreign sponsorship of 9/11. For 15 years, we’ve been told that al-Qaida acted alone, with no state sponsors,” wrote Sperry. “It was all a monstrous lie.”

The Obama administration’s decision to release this report may have to do with America’s relationship with another state sponsor of terrorism, Iran.

Since Iran and Saudi Arabia are longtime adversaries, a damaging report against the Saudis plays well for Obama and his pivot towards Iran.

In fact, the final pages of the 9/11 report were released one year after the U.S. signed its disastrous nuclear deal with Iran.

For decades leading up to the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. cozied up to Saudi Arabia.

Despite mounting evidence the Saudi government was sponsoring terrorism and undermining national security, American leaders looked the other way when it came to the Saudis.

Now we know this unscrupulous relationship may have been at least partly responsible for the 9/11 attacks, as well as the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Rather than learning from perhaps the most sordid mistake in modern history, Obama seems to have dumped one Islamist government in exchange for another.

Out with the Saudi royals, in with Iran’s mullahs.

Barack Obama is placing undue trust in the Iranian regime in the same way that George W. Bush placed undue trust in the Saudis.

And the consequences may be just as deadly.

Image: AP Photo/Marty Lederhandler

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
 
SEARCH
PODCAST

An Update on the NAFTA Renegotiations

May 21, 2018


On today's Global Exchange Podcast, we touch base with CGAI's North American trade experts in light of a busy week on the NAFTA file in Washington. After months of hard-pressed negotiations, and 6 weeks of 'perpetual' discussions in Washington, the deal has reached its next turning point, with Congressional leadership signalling that they'd need a new deal by May 17th in order to have it passed before U.S. mid-term elections in the Fall. With no deal in sight, and the Congressional deadline now in the rear-view mirror, we sit down with Sarah Goldfeder, Laura Dawson, and Eric Miller to ask where we go from here.


IN THE MEDIA

Trump works to cut high-skilled visas in NAFTA deal

by Franco Ordonez & Anita Kumar (feat. Eric Miller), Miami Herald, May 21, 2018

Why killing Alberta’s carbon tax could kill Kinder Morgan pipeline

by Eric Collins (feat. Dennis McConaghy), CBC News, May 19, 2018

Why the NAFTA talks won’t end any time soon

by Kevin Carmichael (feat. Eric Miller), Financial Post , May 18, 2018


LATEST TWEETS

HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9

 

OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6

 

Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca

 

Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.

 

© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001

 


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email