How Canada can lead a bold new trade agenda

How_Canada_can_lead_Montages.jpg

OP-ED

by Randolph Mank

Ottawa Citizen
Feb 10, 2017

Say what you will, U.S. President Donald Trump is clearly committed to keeping his campaign promises. There’s no escaping the resulting disruptions and consequences. His quick re-opening of NAFTA and withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership leave Canada with an uncertain and mostly defensive trade policy agenda.

At the same time, the new president appears keen about deal-making and eager to declare early victories. In that lies a potential opportunity and a way forward for Canada.

We have already signalled our willingness to take the first step of updating NAFTA. We have little choice. But to do nothing more could expose us to collateral damage from the likely more adversarial U.S.-Mexico negotiations. To offset this, we should take the second step of proposing new trilateral trans-Atlantic trade talks.

During her recent visit to Washington, British Prime Minister Theresa May obtained agreement to pursue a bilateral trade deal. Ms. May needs to fill the gap left by Brexit; Mr. Trump is amenable. 

Prime Minister Trudeau meets Trump Monday. Proposing Canada’s participation in such talks would make sense for us on every level, economically, geographically and historically. We need NAFTA but this initiative would provide fresh focus and, if successful, a complementary arrangement. Having recently concluded our own trade agreement with the EU, it would also address the gap for us that will result from Brexit.

As a third step, given that our prosperity depends so much on open global trade, we should pursue a replacement for the TPP, though from a different direction.

The next opportunity to do so may be within the otherwise ineffectual Commonwealth group, which is at long last holding its inaugural trade ministers’ meeting in London in early March. Among its members, along with the U.K. and Canada, are such notable TPP signatories as Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and Malaysia.

Canada should propose to these like-minded partners the pursuit of a new trade agreement that mirrors as much as possible an eventually updated NAFTA in order to attract the U.S., and welcomes any future partners who wish to accede. This is precisely how the TPP emerged from the APEC group: a small coterie of like-minded countries combining efforts to formulate binding trade rules.

In short, we should ultimately be seeking a new and broad-based Trans Atlantic-Pacific Partnership deal. There would be no need to start from scratch, as there is much worth saving in the TPP. Of course, to bring along the Trump administration, repackaging would be imperative.

Filling the gaping hole on the Asia flank is perhaps the greatest challenge. With the demise of the TPP, China will have even more favourable access to Asian markets when negotiations on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) are soon completed. This is not good for many reasons, not least because Canada is shut out.

Japan may be the bridge. While it is also a party to the RCEP process, it signed the TPP because it wants new trade arrangements with the West as well. Its first impulse now will be to seek new bilateral deals. But there is no reason why we cannot propose a broader negotiating umbrella with Japan included.

While past failures in advancing the WTO agenda certainly offer a cautionary tale, harmonizing North American, European and Asian China trade rules should be our future ambition, no matter how difficult it may seem at the moment.

Trump may turn out to be a bilateralist to the core, immovable on any such global trade initiatives. And new initiatives won’t make his “America first” policies any easier to deal with at the negotiating table. Then again, he might just see victory in pursuing international agreements that are even grander and more ambitious than those of his predecessor. For Canada, it would be better to take bold initiatives to advance the principles of free trade than simply to play defence.

Randolph Mank is a three-time Canadian ambassador, who currently serves on the board of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce in Singapore. He is also a Fellow of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute and the Balsillie School of International Affairs.

Image: MANDEL NGAN / AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
 
SEARCH
PODCAST

Evaluating the 2018 U.S. Midterms with Sarah Goldfeder & Laura Dawson

November 12, 2018

On today's Global Exchange Podcast, CGAI Vice President Colin Robertson sits down with CGAI Fellow Sarah Goldfeder and CGAI Advisory Council Member Laura Dawson to discuss last week's midterm election in the United States. Join Colin, Laura, and Sarah as they debate the implications of the 2018 U.S. midterm on the agenda of Donald Trump, the effect a Democratic House of Representatives will have on Canada, as well as what the election means for bilateral relations moving forward.



EXPERTS IN THE MEDIA

Pence announces US-ASEAN ‘Smart Cities Partnership’

by Patsy Widakuswara (feat. Stephen Nagy), VOA News, November 15, 2018

Canada’s Latin American trade complications

by Chuck Chiang (feat. Colin Robertson), Business in Vancouver, November 14, 2018


LATEST TWEETS

HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9

 

OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6

 

Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca

 

Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.

 

© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001

 


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email