Charting power shifts in a new world for diplomats

Charting_power_shifts_in_a_new_world_for_diplomats_Montages.JPG

OP-ED

by Daryl Copeland

The Hill Times
August 10, 2016

The Liberal government has launched defence and development reviews, but little is known of its intentions regarding diplomacy. This is the second of a series meant to offer thoughts on Canada’s role in a changing world.

In the last instalment, I argued that during the Cold War, whatever its many hazards, Canadians were able to find ample room for diplomatic manoeuvreing.

Are opportunities still available today?

Perhaps, but navigation is tough. World order has given way to a whirled order, with many of the old distinctions and assumptions blurred or erased. There is less political or ideological conviction, and more volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. In the 25 years since the Soviet Union imploded and the icy grip of Cold War constraint melted away, much has changed. The Great Thaw has transformed the operating environment, freeing up virulent strains of ethno-nationalism, nourishing religious fundamentalism, and gestating a new threat set.

Defining features

1. Intensified globalization: With more trade, investment, travel, and migration, globalization speeds up time while compressing and deterritorializing political space. Driven by the revolution in information and communication technologies, globalization is the defining historical process of our times.

The globalization age came into its own at the end of the Cold War and has survived many crises since, including the Great Recession of 2008-09.

Globalization’s flagship is the internet, and its transnational tides have eroded sovereignty and reduced the importance of borders.

But globalization is not a neutral force. It is linked to deregulation, privatization, free trade, and austerity—all parts of a laissez-faire package intended to reduce government’s size and scope, and enlarge the private sector’s role.

Globalization creates wealth, but not for all. Its tendency towards the socialization of costs and privatization of gains exacerbates inequality. Whatever its virtues—not least the efficient allocation of productive resources—the greater connectivity that is a hallmark of globalization has also engendered mass anxiety, resentment, and alienation.

On globalization’s underside—in the world’s banlieues, barrios, and export processing zones—underdevelopment and insecurity flourish. The erstwhile global village looks increasingly like a modern-day Dickensian dystopia: a smattering of gated “green zones” engulfed by a seething sea of shantytowns. Brexit, Donald Trump, populism, plutocracy…cosmopolitan, but unrepresentative elites are in trouble most everywhere as the tribes rise and the demons multiply.

2. Power shift: Since leaving behind the comparative stability of the Cold War, power at all levels is now on the move. Much has been made of emergence of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and migration of the global political economy’s centre of gravity from the North Atlantic to the Asia Pacific. Also significant is the end of state centricity in international relations and the emergence of new actors. Foreign ministries have lost much of their turf to cabinet offices, executive bodies, and other government departments.

Power is shifting up (to central agencies and supra-national institutions), out (to multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations, and private philanthropic foundations,) and down (to sub-national players such as states, provinces, cities, and even wealthy celebrities).

Both rising and declining power require careful handling. Given the stakes associated with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, we must do a better job of managing the shift than was the case during previous centuries, when war served as the ultimate arbiter.

In this very fluid environment, traditional diplomatic methods and tools will need to be supplemented by less conventional, more innovative approaches.

3. Heteropolis rising: The model of world order now under construction can be described as heteropolar. During the multi- and bi-polar eras of the past few centuries, the sources and vectors of power and influence among countries with generally equivalent levels of development were mostly similar and easy to measure: military might, population size, national wealth, etc.

Today those sources and vectors are characterized by difference (heterogeneity) rather than similarity (homogeneity), so they’re harder to compare or balance.

Great statesmen with longstanding interpersonal familiarity, each with a slightly different hand but playing from the same deck, no longer gather regularly to negotiate over green felt tables. Unlike the clubby days of the Congress of Vienna, in the 21st century the United States, China, Russia, India, Brazil, Turkey, Indonesia, and Japan have little in common.

Moreover, many poles are not states; they may be multinational corporations, groups of states (European Union), NGOs (Amnesty International), or even individuals (Bill Gates). In the emerging heteropolis, balancing power is becoming more complex.

The effective management of global issues will require evidence-based decision-making and knowledge-based, technologically-enabled problem-solving. As there are no military solutions to the most pressing challenges facing humanity, these functions must depend primarily on diplomacy rather than defence.

I will assess the implications for Canada in the final instalment.

Former diplomat Daryl Copeland is an educator, analyst, and consultant; the author of Guerrilla Diplomacy; a research fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute and a policy fellow at the University of Montreal’s Centre for International Studies (CERIUM). Follow him on Twitter @GuerrillaDiplo.

Image credit: PMO - Adam Scotti

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
 
SEARCH
PODCAST

Brian Mulroney as a Master of Persuasion: A Discussion with Fen Hampson

August 20, 2018

On today's Global Exchange Podcast, we sit down with the Chancellor’s Professor at Carleton University, and CIGI Fellow, Fen Osler Hampson, to discuss his recently released book entitled "Master of Persuasion: Brian Mulroney's Global Legacy".



EXPERTS IN THE MEDIA

Northern defence upgrades part of plan to protect Canada’s Arctic, Sajjan says

by Alex Brockman (feat. Rob Huebert), CBC News, August 20, 2018

Les Forces canadiennes dans un Arctique en plein changement

by Mario De Ciccio (feat. Rob Huebert), Radio-Canada, August 20, 2018

China and Russia strengthening relationship in bid to thwart US dominance

by Matthew Carney (feat. Stephen Nagy), ABC, August 19, 2018

Multiculturalism is here to stay.. but what about Maxime Bernier?

by Anna Desmarais (feat. Andrew Griffith), iPolitics, August 17, 2018

What happens when building pipelines becomes Fortnite?

by Chris Varcoe (feat. Dennis McConaghy & Kevin Birn), Calgary Herald, August 17, 2018

Gracing Canada on NAFTA: Experts weigh in, one year later

by Nicole Gibillini (feat. Colin Robertson), BNN Bloomberg, August 16, 2018


LATEST TWEETS

HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9

 

OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6

 

Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca

 

Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.

 

© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001

 


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email