In The Media

Sleepers and strange bedfellows

by Gordon Smith

 iPolitics
August 31, 2012

“Sleepers” are not just Le Carre-like foreign spies hiding in our midst. They are also political issues where the potential consequences of things going wrong are seriously underestimated beforehand.

“Strange bedfellows” occur when political actors with very different values, opportunistically but perhaps not happily, end up as tactical allies, at least temporarily.

A complex cast of strange bedfellows is currently preparing to “go to the mattresses” (as in The Godfather) at meetings that will take place in Dubai from December 3-14. One hundred and ninety-three states represented in some cases by heads of government will negotiate amendments to the International Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs) administered by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU).

What is at stake? A number of sleeper issues that collectively amount to nothing less than the future of the Internet: who decides what it carries, and who decides what we may have to pay (and to whom) to access it.

How are the forces lining up? While governments will be officially represented, important non-state actors are seeking to influence the outcome. The result is a set of surprising coalitions. Those who want more order range from countries worried about political dissent (e.g. China and Iran) to those who want to protect their intellectual property (e.g. record labels and movie makers) or billing models (e.g. European telcos). Those who want less or no order include hackers, civil society groups concerned about privacy, advocates of unlimited freedom of expression, as well as criminal elements.

How is the Internet now governed? It is managed through something called multi-stakeholder governance, which refers to arrangements that include governments, international organizations, corporations and non-profits, as well as civil society groups. These arrangements reflect the growth of the Internet from a military and scientific project into the social and commercial entity we know today.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), based in California, is the key body that ensures the Internet runs well. The former CEO of ICANN, Rod Beckstrom, took a number of steps to increase outreach and consultation – including opening the governance of ICANN to nationals of other countries. For example, Xiaodong Lee (a major Internet player in China) is an ICANN Vice-President.

ICANN’s objective is a globally accessible, unified and reliable Internet. But ICANN remains a US corporation, and therefore objectionable to some on principle.

There is a move afoot to include the Internet in the above-mentioned ITRs. It is possible one or more non-binding resolutions to this effect could pass in Dubai. If that sleeper awakes, or even if it doesn’t, there will be more such attempts in the next few years. The objective will be to solidify as a norm the belief that the ITU ought to manage the Internet. It is important to resist this, and work to improve the present multi-stakeholder process.

Despite its flaws, the existing set of multi-stakeholder arrangements remains the best available option to ensure a reliable, global Internet that balances safeguards for privacy and freedom of expression with legitimate security concerns.

For most of the developed world, the Internet has become a necessity, but one that is taken for granted. In addition to its economic value, the political consequences of free access to information and the capacity to network have been huge; one need only think of the Arab Spring.

These values are under threat from numerous directions. Organized crime is increasingly exploiting the Internet for purposes of theft. Fringe hacker elements include those so opposed to the creation of new rules that they are willing to bring down the house on everybody’s head; Operation Global Blackout, for example, threatens to bring down the Domain Name System (DNS). Such threats prompted the head of the US National Security Agency, General Keith Alexander, to travel one month ago to Las Vegas for DefCon, the largest hacker conference in the world (upwards of 10,000 participants), to ask for help. Strange bedfellows indeed!

States themselves are ramping up their capabilities in the area of cyber-espionage and cyber-warfare.

The control of the Internet is high international power politics. Sophisticated state-sponsored computer attacks have breached government and corporate networks, compromising confidential information.

More recent attacks have used viruses to perform acts of sabotage – the Stuxnet attack on the Iranian nuclear program is one example. While it is unlikely such activities can be stopped, the lack of clear rules and norms surrounding state security activities on the Internet leaves a vacuum that heightens political tensions, corrodes rights and freedoms, and potentially risks lives.

We need a comprehensive view of, and debate on, the future of the Internet, and we need it soon. The Internet has become (largely) a global public good. Its preservation and enhancement ought to be a foreign policy priority, above all for democracies.

Gordon Smith is a distinguished fellow of the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute as well as director of the Centre for Global Studies, and adjunct professor of political science at the University of Victoria. Dr. Smith had a distinguished career with the Department of Foreign Affairs, which included posts as deputy minister, ambassador to the European Union, and ambassador to NATO. Since 1997, Dr. Smith has served as chairman of Canada’s International Development Research Centre. He currently holds positions as executive director of the Canadian Institute for Climate Studies, and board director of the International Forum de Montréal. He holds a Ph.D. in political science from MIT.


Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
 
SEARCH
PODCAST

The Royal Canadian Navy in the Indo-Pacific: A Discussion with Matthew Fisher

June 18, 2018



On today's Global Exchange Podcast, we turn our eyes to the Indo-Pacific, as we assess Canada's naval presence in the region, and the recent deployment of MV Asterix to take part in various multilateral exercises with Canada's Pacific allies. Join our host, Dave Perry, in conversation with CGAI Fellow Matthew Fisher, as they discuss Canada's naval presence around the Indo-Pacific, Chinese military build-up throughout the East and South China Seas, the successes of MV Asterix's recent deployment in the Pacific, and a future for the Canadian Navy in an increasingly militarized Pacific environment.


IN THE MEDIA

Security firm named in lawsuit against Ottawa once accused of recruiting ex-child soldiers

by Murray Brewster (feat. Dave Perry), CBC News, June 21, 2018

Rare foreign investment in the oilsands as Nexen proceeds with $400M expansion

by Geoffrey Morgan (feat. Kevin Birn), Financial Post, June 20, 2018

Ottawa’s efforts to restore relations with Tehran going ‘nowhere,’ says academic

by Beatrice Paez (feat. Thomas Juneau), The Hill Times, June 20, 2018


LATEST TWEETS

HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9

 

OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6

 

Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca

 

Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.

 

© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001

 


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email