Is it Time for a Canadian as NATO SecGen?

NATO_SecGen_Story_Pic.JPG

COMMENTARY

by Brett Boudreau
Read The Full 'Up For Debate' Discussion on Frontline Defence
April 26, 2018

The ‘decade of disdain’ for NATO, under the Prime Minister Stephen Harper / Minister of National Defence Peter MacKay / Chief of the Defence Staff General Rick Hillier period, marked a nadir for Canada-Alliance relations. Recently, there have been earnest efforts to repair the bond, but Canada remains far from any serious consideration as the prospective source of a future NATO Secretary-General.

Last December, NATO’s 29 member nations unanimously extended Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg’s four-year term for another two years, to 30 Sept 2020. Of the 13 leaders since the position was created in 1952, the Netherlands and the UK have each been the source country for three Secretaries General, Belgium twice, and Denmark, Germany, Italy, Norway and Spain once each. Canada does not deserve, should not expect, and should not want to join that list anytime soon.

The four main reasons for this can be summed up in four Cs (capability, contributions, candidates, and continent). Canada’s real military capability is low, relative to other key, long-standing members and partners (such as Australia). Actual contributions to the Alliance, as well as filling important headquarters positions, remain overly modest. There is a decided lack of Canadian candidates with the necessary experience and gravitas. And, we happen to be on the wrong continent....

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE ON FRONTLINE DEFENCE

Image credit: NATO

Showing 1 reaction

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Michael Shannon
    commented 2018-04-28 19:39:59 -0400
    Canada shouldn’t provide head of NATO simply because NATO is about Americans coming to rescue Europeans- who no longer are in peril. Canada’s primary role on NATO’s formation was to set an example for the US. Given the end of the Warsaw Pact and the massive disparity in power between the European parts of NATO and Russia there’s no real reason for Canada to be in NATO let alone supply it’s titular head. Of course DND would argue we should stay put- but with three LGen positions at stake that would be expected.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
 
SEARCH
PODCAST

An Update on NAFTA: Can We Get To A Deal?

September 17, 2018

On today's Global Exchange Podcast, we continue our discussion on the future of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Join host Colin Robertson in conversation with CGAI Fellows Sarah Goldfeder and Eric Miller as they recap the past few weeks of NAFTA negotiations, outline the enduring hot-button issues, and provide some predictions on whether the three NAFTA parties can get to a deal before the end of September.



EXPERTS IN THE MEDIA

An end to the Korean War may be in sight

by Danielle Smith (feat. Marius Grinius), Global News Radio, September 20, 2018

Canada shale drillers feel Permian pain as prices collapse

by Robert Tuttle (feat. Kevin Birn), BNN Bloomberg, September 20, 2018

Latin America is the murder capital of the world

by David Luhnow (feat. Robert Muggah), Wall Street Journal, September 20, 2018


LATEST TWEETS

HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4K9

 

OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute
8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 5S6

 

Phone: (613) 288-2529
Email: contact@cgai.ca
Web: cgai.ca

 

Making sense of our complex world.
Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.

 

© 2002-2018 Canadian Global Affairs Institute
Charitable Registration No. 87982 7913 RR0001

 


Sign in with Facebook | Sign in with Twitter | Sign in with Email