In The Media

Parliament begins review of new national security legislation

by Neil Desai

The Hill Times
February 2, 2015

As we enter another period of global instability, Western, liberal-democracies, must strive to reshape the security-civil liberties dichotomy

There is often willingness from the general public to cede some civil liberties, including privacy, in periods of heightened security. Here in Canada, public safety and national security are again, top of mind. A recent poll by Abacus Data shows that 18 per cent of Canadians list public safety and terrorism as one of their top three issues. In March 2014, the poll showed only four per cent responding this way. 

As we enter another period of global instability, Western, liberal-democracies, must strive to reshape the security-civil liberties dichotomy. This is ever so relevant here in Canada as the memory of our Parliament and Canadian Forces members being attacked by assailants, motivated by the hateful propaganda produced by ISIS, is fresh. This is exacerbated by the recent attacks at the offices of Charlie Hebdo magazine in France.

At the heart of solving the security-civil liberties dichotomy is technology. Unfortunately, much of the global skepticism in government and law enforcements’ respect for civil liberties is perceived to be technologically-driven. However, the data unveiled by Snowden and Wikileaks is not an indictment of technology or technological capability.   

The nature of national security and public safety threats continues to evolve quickly. Just as technology has enabled global commerce at rapid rates, crime has globalized and reached velocities never seen in history. The internet has become a tool for terrorist recruiting and training, human trafficking and child exploitation among other crimes. A whole new category of crime, cybercrimes, has proliferated. According to a study by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the annual cost of cybercrime to the global economy is estimated at $445-billion. Law enforcement officers are saddled with the burden of dealing with these new types of crime and digital evidence while under resource constraints.

Beyond cybercrime, law enforcement is also faced with unprecedented jurisdictional challenges as it tries to protect citizens from the unscrupulous. A Council of Canadian Academies report, titled “Policing Canada in the 21st Century,” suggests that “the lack of coordination has the potential to become a much greater concern in the future given the growing cross-jurisdictional nature of crime.”

Law enforcement and national security agencies in Canada and around the world have the arduous task of understanding new technologies while balancing jurisdictional and civil liberties challenges. The technology industry has an important role in addressing these challenges.

First, the industry must be a partner of police and security agencies in managing technology and technological challenges. Governments, under the best of fiscal circumstances, cannot be expected to continually evolve to match the constant innovation of the technology sector. Details of these partnerships must be transparent to build trust with each other and the general public. 

Second, the technology sector, police, and national security organizations need to partner to develop new tools to not only address today’s threats, but to also anticipate future threats. Such a partnership should put respect for civil liberties and managing jurisdictional challenges at the heart of its dialogue. It is only through the purposeful co-development of such tools that will we see the technological lag between crime and law enforcement closed as well as the tension between security and civil liberties turned in to a false-dichotomy.

Neil Desai is an executive with Magnet Forensics, a digital forensic software company in Waterloo, Ont. He also serves as a fellow with the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto and the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute and is a former chief of staff to the CIDA minister.


Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
Donate to Canadian Global Affairs Institute Subscribe
 

SEARCH


 

IN THE MEDIA


Ottawa puts economic strings on fighter jets
by Lee Berthiaume (feat. Dave Perry), The Canadian Press, December 13, 2017

Liberal's new 'naughty and nice list' approach to defence contractors could face legal, trade challenges
by Murray Brewster (feat. Dave Perry), CBC News, December 13, 2017

Le Canada adresse un avertissement aux Etats-Unis via Boeing
by Michel Comte (feat. Dave Perry), France 24, December 13, 2017

Federal government to link ‘economic interests’ to bids for fighter jets
by Daniel Leblanc (feat. Dave Perry), The Globe and Mail, December 12, 2017

Liberal Plan For Interim Jets Tackles 'Capability Gap' That Doesn't Exist: Experts
by Althia Raj (feat. Dave Perry & Al Stephenson), The Huffington Post, December 12, 2017

Ottawa relaunches the process to buy 88 new fighter jets
by Bruce Campion-Smith (feat. Dave Perry), Toronto Star, December 12, 2017

AUDIO: So... are we getting new jets or what?
with Rob Breakenridge (feat. Al Stephenson), AM 770 CHQR, December 12, 2017

VIDEO: Achat de F-18 Usagés
with Pierre Donais (feat. Ferry de Kerckhove), CPAC, December 12, 2017

 

LATEST TWEETS


Donate | Submit | Media Inquiries
Making sense of our complex world. | Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.
 
HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute

Suite 1800, 421-7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada  T2P 4K9
 
OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute

8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada  K1N 5S6

Phone: (613) 288-2529 
Email: contact@cgai.ca 
Web: cgai.ca
 
2002-2015 Canadian Global Affairs Institute

Charitable Registration No.  87982 7913 RR0001