Op-ed

Diversity_in_GiC_appointments_Montages.JPG

Ukraine has a peace deal. Why isn't it working?

by Andrew Rasiulis

iPolitics
March 2, 2017

With the Trump administration getting its policy framework in gear, it’s a good time to reflect on the lack of progress to date in implementing the key political terms of the Minsk 2 ceasefire deal, agreed to in February 2015 between the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany and intended to ensure a lasting peace in Ukraine.

Two years have passed without significant progress on either Ukrainian constitutional reform or the restoration of Ukrainian sovereign control over the rebel-held Donbass region and the border with Russia.

It was agreed in the text of Minsk 2 that the political framework of constitutional reform would lead to some form of autonomy in the Donbass, verified by local elections — which would lead to the restoration of Ukrainian sovereign control over the breakaway region.

This process should have been completed by the end of 2015. Instead, thus far we’ve seen a political stalemate with sporadic military confrontations along the ceasefire line. What happened?

On the critical issue of autonomy, the sequence was that Kiev was to pass special legislation granting semi-autonomy to the Donbass, including protection of the Russian language. Under this legislation, the rebel areas would hold elections to determine their form of self government within a united but federated Ukraine. This step required a major political change within Ukraine to move from a centralized to a federated state.

Once this phase was complete, the Russians were to then use their influence over the rebels and hand over border control between the Donbass and Russia to Kiev’s control. Minsk did not address Crimea — that’s a matter that must be addressed by a different diplomatic mechanism.

Minsk 2 does have its sequential logic. The issue for Kiev is that it considers it politically suicidal to grant autonomy to the Donbass in the face of Ukrainian nationalists. The Russians and the Donbass rebels will not settle for anything less, economic sanctions notwithstanding. Result: stalemate.

It now remains to be seen whether the Trump administration will have the influence with players in Kiev and Moscow to make a deal on Ukraine in 2017.

Image: AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
Donate to Canadian Global Affairs Institute Subscribe
 

SEARCH


 

EVENTS

 

IN THE MEDIA


Plan to buy used fighter jets from Australia far from straightforward, experts say
by Murray Brewster (feat. David Perry), CBC News, October 16, 2017

The Senate was independent long before Trudeau's partisan changes came along
by David Tkachuk (feat. Andrew Griffith), Toronto Sun, October 14, 2017

Face-Reading AI Will Detect Politics and IQ, Expert Says
by Sam Levin (feat. Tom Keenan), Sci-Tech Today, October 13, 2017

Catalogne: Trudeau se garde toujours de réagir directement à la situation
by Melanie Marquis (feat. Ferry de Kerckhove), La Presse , October 3, 2017

 

LATEST TWEETS


Donate | Submit | Media Inquiries
Making sense of our complex world. | Déchiffrer la complexité de notre monde.
 
HEAD OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute

Suite 1800, 421 7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada  T2P 4K9
 
OTTAWA OFFICE
Canadian Global Affairs Institute

8 York Street, 2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada  K1N 5S6

Phone: (613) 288-2529 
Email: contact@cgai.ca 
Web: cgai.ca
 
2002-2015 Canadian Global Affairs Institute

Charitable Registration No.  87982 7913 RR0001